"When a government becomes powerful, it is destructive, extravagant and violent; it is an usurper which takes bread from innocent mouths and deprives honorable men of their substance for votes with which to perpetuate itself." - Cicero "Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is force." - George Washington "In all that people can do for themselves, the government ought not to interfere." - Abraham Lincoln "The most cogent reason for restricting the interference of government is the great evil of adding unnecessarily to its power." - John Stuart Mill "The government's role is whatever the government defines it to be." - Helen Clark |
Kiwi Pundit |
![]() ![]() |
|
Home
XML Feed NEWS Google News NZ Stuff (INL) NZ Herald TV One News TV Three News NZ City Scoop Real Clear Politics The Drudge Report PHILOSOPHY LINKS The Importance of Philosophy The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Critical Rationalism Denis Dutton The Sokal Hoax LEGAL LINKS NZ Legislation NZ Court of Appeal Judgments Findlaw's Writ Famous Trials The Old Bailey Encyclopedia of Law and Economics POLITICS LINKS Reason Magazine The Christopher Hitchens Web PoliticalTheory.Info The Museum of Communism Institute for Liberal Values The Education Forum Liberté, j'écris ton nom Lucianne.com OTHER LINKS NZ Humanist Association Arts and Letters Daily Human Rights Watch Tech Central Station The Best of Economics Pipers LysanderSpooner.org Blogarama Review Kiwi Pundit < ? kiwi blogs # >
inHOUSE: Software development and services, web design, computer training, crystal reports, sql, business intelligence and reporting in Wellington, New Zealand |
Monday, December 17, 2007
Inequality One of the things I decided when I started this blog is that I wasn't going to blog about blogging. Too many blogs I otherwise enjoy do this. The stuff is boring and I skip right over it. But I couldn't resist linking to this (via Paul at the Fundy Post). Here's the main highlight: Inequality on the WebThe web is, in fact, almost a perfect meritocracy. Nobody needs to know your race, religion, gender, age or hair colour unless you choose to reveal it. There is no cost, qualification or other barriers to entry and (cross fingers) government regulation has so far been light. Yet there is always someone who will cry about inequality and is just blind to the fact that inequality can arise from people being less capable than others, or making different choices. Obviously those who can't afford a computer and internet connection are excluded, but the article is about active participants as a percentage of all internet users, not as a percentage of the population. Paul's response is spot on: Of course, this sort of thing is not a new problem. Participation in the High Renaissance was a constant worry for contemporary advocates of an inclusive and diverse society: research found that, in all Italian city states surveyed, less than one per cent of the population had completed a fresco in the previous twelve months; rates for the playing of the viola da gamba and the invention of flying machines also were disappointingly low; only such activities as kicking a pig's bladder around the streets, jew-baiting and fornication proved to have widespread popular appeal.Nothing much has changed then. |